[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465666AE.5020600@drzeus.cx>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:31:42 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make prepare_namespace() wait for devices
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Whatever. I think you can work it out ;)
>
>
Bare with me, I just woke up ;)
> while (driver_probe_done() || (ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(...)) == 0)
>
> perhaps?
>
> The loop-which-sleeps within a loop-which-sleeps seems poorly thought out?
>
I'd say a matter of taste. I'm not a big fan och cramming things into
the while() clause.
The idea with the double loops was to keep this thread asleep when we
could detect meaningful work elsewhere in the kernel. You could just
remove the inner-most loop if it offends you. :)
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists