linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make prepare_namespace() wait for devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <465EAF90.3030803@drzeus.cx>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2007 13:20:48 +0200
From:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make prepare_namespace() wait for devices

What was the verdict here? Were you satisfied with this or do you need a change?

Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Whatever.  I think you can work it out ;)   
>>
>>   
> 
> Bare with me, I just woke up ;)
> 
>> while (driver_probe_done() || (ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(...)) == 0)
>>
>> perhaps?
>>
>> The loop-which-sleeps within a loop-which-sleeps seems poorly thought out?
>>   
> 
> I'd say a matter of taste. I'm not a big fan och cramming things into
> the while() clause.
> 
> The idea with the double loops was to keep this thread asleep when we
> could detect meaningful work elsewhere in the kernel. You could just
> remove the inner-most loop if it offends you. :)
> 

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/