lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020705271317q3e46fd88u58058686edf71829@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 May 2007 23:17:51 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc:	"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [condingstyle] Add chapter on tests

On 5/27/07, Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote:
> that piece is a copy of mm/slab.c, and all over the core components of the
> kernel (even fs/inode.c written by Linus). I strongly think that "== NULL"
> doesn't add anything and that well-written functions and well-named variables
> really do not need the extra fluff.

Yup, I we really don't use "== NULL" in core code that much. But I am
not convinced this should be in CodingStyle either. It's more of a
maintainer preference thing above all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ