linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] use printk.time option, drop time/notime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070529130705.fdf43e4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 May 2007 13:07:05 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rene.herman@...il.com,
	mjt@....msk.ru, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use printk.time option, drop time/notime

On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:15:35 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:

> Allow printk_time to be enabled or disabled at boot time.
> Previously it could be enabled only, but not disabled.
> 
> Change printk_time from an int to a bool since that's what it is.
> Make its logical (exposed) name just be "time" (was "printk_time").
> 
> Note:  Changes kernel boot option syntax from "time" to "printk.time=value".

That's going to break a *lot* of people's setups - timestamping appears
to be very popular.  We will get sad emails from people.

If we're going to do this then I'm afraid we should retain the `time='
thing for a while and add a this-is-going-away printk to it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/