linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] use printk.time option, drop time/notime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705292328030.11140@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Tue, 29 May 2007 23:28:54 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rene.herman@...il.com,
	mjt@....msk.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use printk.time option, drop time/notime


On May 29 2007 13:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> Allow printk_time to be enabled or disabled at boot time.
>> Previously it could be enabled only, but not disabled.
>> 
>> Change printk_time from an int to a bool since that's what it is.
>> Make its logical (exposed) name just be "time" (was "printk_time").
>> 
>> Note:  Changes kernel boot option syntax from "time" to "printk.time=value".
>
>That's going to break a *lot* of people's setups - timestamping appears
>to be very popular.  We will get sad emails from people.
>
>If we're going to do this then I'm afraid we should retain the `time='
>thing for a while and add a this-is-going-away printk to it.
>

Reminds me of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/1/163 (minus the ANSI sequences,
though that WOULD have gotten their attention)...


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/