linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 00:39:59 -0700
From:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	menage@...gle.com, dev@...ru, xemul@...ru, serue@...ibm.com,
	vatsa@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, haveblue@...ibm.com,
	svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ibm.com, pj@....com,
	cpw@....com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	mbligh@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:14:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So how do we do this?
> Is there any sneaky way in which we can modify the kernel so that this new
> code gets exercised more?  Obviously, tossing init into some default
> system-wide container would be a start.  But I wonder if we can be
> sneakier - for example, create a new container on each setuid(), toss the
> task into that.  Or something along those lines?

How about a container for each thread group, pgrp, session, and user?


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/