[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465D3141.305@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:39:37 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: menage@...gle.com, dev@...ru, xemul@...ru, serue@...ibm.com,
vatsa@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, haveblue@...ibm.com,
svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ibm.com, pj@....com,
cpw@....com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
mbligh@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007 06:01:04 -0700 menage@...gle.com wrote:
>
>> This is an update to my multi-hierarchy multi-subsystem generic
>> process containers patch.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Still TODO:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> - lots more testing
>>
>
> So how do we do this?
>
> Is there any sneaky way in which we can modify the kernel so that this new
> code gets exercised more? Obviously, tossing init into some default
> system-wide container would be a start. But I wonder if we can be
> sneakier - for example, create a new container on each setuid(), toss the
> task into that. Or something along those lines?
Please, lets get the RSS controller in. It's ready, been tested
and commented on widely.
I'll also start porting my containerstats patches on top of -v10.
--
Thanks,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists