[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465D3D91.5010807@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:09 +0400
From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, menage@...gle.com,
dev@...ru, serue@...ibm.com, vatsa@...ibm.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, haveblue@...ibm.com,
svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ibm.com, pj@....com,
cpw@....com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
mbligh@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
Balbir Singh wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 May 2007 06:01:04 -0700 menage@...gle.com wrote:
>>
>>> This is an update to my multi-hierarchy multi-subsystem generic
>>> process containers patch.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Still TODO:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> - lots more testing
>>>
>> So how do we do this?
>>
>> Is there any sneaky way in which we can modify the kernel so that this new
>> code gets exercised more? Obviously, tossing init into some default
>> system-wide container would be a start. But I wonder if we can be
>> sneakier - for example, create a new container on each setuid(), toss the
>> task into that. Or something along those lines?
>
> Please, lets get the RSS controller in. It's ready, been tested
It is not 100% ready yet actually :) I am working on it right now
and hope to get ready till tomorrow.
> and commented on widely.
Yup :) Balbir, thanks for testing, your patches are already in.
> I'll also start porting my containerstats patches on top of -v10.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists