[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070530133407.4f5789a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:34:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 9/9] Scheduler profiling - Use conditional calls
On Wed, 30 May 2007 10:00:34 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> @@ -2990,7 +2991,8 @@
> print_irqtrace_events(prev);
> dump_stack();
> }
> - profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0));
> + cond_call(profile_on,
> + profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0)));
>
That's looking pretty neat. Do you have any before-and-after performance
figures for i386 and for a non-optimised architecture?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists