linux-kernel - Re: [patch 9/9] Scheduler profiling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 13:59:27 -0700
From:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 9/9] Scheduler profiling - Use conditional calls

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Use conditional calls with lower d-cache hit in optimized version as a
> condition for scheduler profiling call.
[...]
> +	if (prof_on)
> +		BUG_ON(cond_call_arm("profile_on"));

What's the point of this BUG_ON()? The condition is a priori impossible.


On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> -	profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0));
> +	cond_call(profile_on,
> +		profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0)));

It'd probably be prettier to stuff cond_call() inside a macro that does
something like this named profile_hit() with the old profile_hit()
renamed to __profile_hit() etc. Otherwise fine.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/