[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070530000528.GA1680@localdomain>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 03:05:28 +0300
From: Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Dealing with flaky USB storage devices and rootfs
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:50:49PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007, Dan Aloni wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have a system where the rootfs is a partition on a USB device,
> > and I've noticed upon a few rare cases where the USB controller
> > loses the connection to the USB device after some uptime (days,
> > weeks...), and the USB device reappears a very short time later.
>
> That failure mode is pretty uncommon. More often what happens is the
> connection remains intact but communication/protocol/firmware/???
> errors cause the device to stop working. It never disappears but it
> can't be used again without unplugging or power-cycling.
Yes this is also what I assume happening. i.e. more likely a USB
flash disk firmware bug than a controller bug (there are lots of
crappy USB flash drives out there).
> > So, I gave some thoughts about this, I and came up with two
> > main solutions:
> >
> > 1) Improve the USB storage error handling - bind the already
> > existing SCSI host to the USB port that has the device, e.g.,
> > if host2 got created for usb 5-3 then keep it that way for the
> > sake of EH. /dev/sda1 should come to life when the USB device
> > recovers, unless a few seconds have passed or some attributes
> > (such as manufactor id or serial) have changed.
>
> The difficulty here is that this "error" is indistinguishable from
> normal activity -- someone simply unplugs the device and then later on
> another connection is made. It might be the same device as before or
> it might be a different one. In other words, it isn't really an error.
> You would solve this by relying on "a few seconds" timeout.
[...]
>
> It also goes against the USB specification. And it is potentially
> unsafe, in that it is possible for users to change media or make other
> alterations that the kernel cannot detect. The same would be true of
> your proposal, assuming that somebody was quick enough to unplug one
> device and plug in another (or swap memory cards) in the span of a few
> seconds.
The specific use case I refer to is with a flash drive embedded
inside a locked and closed chassis of a dedicated server. So,
anyone repluging it must know what they are doing anyway.
--
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists