linux-kernel - Re: joydev.c and saitek cyborg evo force

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 02:10:53 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Renato Golin <rengolin@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
Subject: Re: joydev.c and saitek cyborg evo force

On Wed, 30 May 2007, Renato Golin wrote:

> The HID sources are quite different from 2.6.21 and 2.6.20 but I don't 
> know how much was because Canonical guys and how much it really changed. 
> :( I will eventually put a Gentoo on my old laptop and try it for real, 
> sorry I couldn't be of much help now...

Hi Renato,

well I have changed the overall HID code design in 2.6.21 a little bit. 
Anyway, just hardcoding '#define DEBUG' and '#define DEBUG_DATA' (that's 
also important) in 2.6.20-and-older kernels should have similar result as 
CONFIG_HID_DEBUG in post-2.6.21.

In your particular case, the DEBUG_DATA might really be more interesting.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/