[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070530145123.fe5cb196.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:51:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + fix-soft-lockup-when-removing-netconsole-module.patch added
to -mm tree
On Thu, 31 May 2007 01:01:37 +0400
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> wrote:
> Jason Wessel wrote:
> >
> > The netpoll_cleanup handler can hang the kernel if there is no work in the
> > work queue because a call to cancel_rearming_delayed_work() with no work
> > goes into an infinite loop.
>
> This should not be true any longer, cancel_rearming_delayed_work() should work
> correctly in any case.
>
> Could you please clarify?
We need a 2.6.21.x fix.
> > @@ -771,30 +771,32 @@ void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
> >
> > [...snip...]
> >
> > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&npinfo->refcnt)) {
> > + skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->arp_tx);
> > + skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->txq);
> > + if (delayed_work_pending(&npinfo->tx_work)) {
> > cancel_rearming_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work);
> > flush_scheduled_work();
>
> But this "if (delayed_work_pending())" is racy anyway?
>
I guess so, a bit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists