[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m164695hqm.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 05:56:33 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> writes:
>
>>> However we
>>>could still set_page_dirty of a block device page without buffers
>>>via an mmap.
>>
>>
>> After the page is made dirty via mmap we have:
>> sys_write -> ... -> block_prepare_write -> ... -> create_empty_buffers.
>
> Yep, that's what I mean.
Actually I just took a second look. That path is fine because
create_empty_buffers already performs the page dirty check.
>> I suspect that is a pretty rare case but it does indeed seem to exist
>> as a problem.
>
> I think so too. But either we have some misunderstanding of the
> codepaths involved, or the author of the comments there didn't
> consider this case, so...
Do someone needs to stand up and write the additional patches.
Do we have a maintainer for fs/buffer.c?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists