[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070531085556.11649c70.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:55:56 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers
On Thu, 31 May 2007 05:56:33 -0600 ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> >> I suspect that is a pretty rare case but it does indeed seem to exist
> >> as a problem.
> >
> > I think so too. But either we have some misunderstanding of the
> > codepaths involved, or the author of the comments there didn't
> > consider this case, so...
>
> Do someone needs to stand up and write the additional patches.
> Do we have a maintainer for fs/buffer.c?
me, if any one, I guess. But I haven't really been following
this discussion - too long and slow ;) 'twould be good if you
could reprise it all in one email, presumably in diff -u form..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists