lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: 31 May 2007 15:42:50 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> writes: > Reimplementation of the cond calls which uses a hash table to hold the active > cond_calls. It permits to first arm a cond_call and then load supplementary > modules that contain this cond_call. Hash table is probably overkill. This is a very very slow path operation. Can you simplify the code? Just a linked list of all the condcall segments should be enough and then walk it. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/