linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] Something goes wrong with timer statistics.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070531171007.5780e5e6.dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2007 17:10:07 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
Cc:	iank@...dband.net, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Something goes wrong with timer statistics.

On Thu, 31 May 2007 16:25:22 +0200
Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de> wrote:

> On 2007.05.31 12:20:47 +0200, iank@...dband.net wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:14:58PM +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > > Initialize the "next" field of a timer stats entry before it is inserted
> > > into the list to avoid a race with the fastpath lookup.
> > 
> > Sorry to say... but this does not fix my problem, however, i can't reach
> > that machine at all atm, but i will post the oops later today.
> 
> Ok, three times is a charm, right? ;-) The previous patch did fix a
> race, but there's still one left. The hash table is never cleared, so it
> can still point into the entries array.
> 
> As long as we do not race with the insertion, that's not a directly
> visible problem as all fields are 0, so we get no match and the lookup
> finishes right away. We probably _can_ get weird results though, as the
> all-zero entry isn't marked as used, but is used as "head" and "prev" in
> this case and even multiple hash entries might point to it in some
> cases.  That would eventually lead to lost entries because the "next"
> field gets overwritten when alloc_entry() finally claims the entry.
> 
> But when we race, we can still end up between "*curr = *entry" (makes
> "next" contain garbage) and "curr->next = NULL", while we're doing the
> fastpath lookup, because the insertion basically already took place!
> Replacing "curr->next = NULL" with "entry->next = NULL" and moving it up
> is pointless, as "*curr = *entry" isn't atomic, so instead, we have to
> simply clean the hash table when the entries are cleared.
> 
> Björn
> 
> 
> Fix two races in the timer stats lookup code. One by ensuring that the
> initialization of a new entry is finished upon insertion of that entry.
> The other by cleaning up the hash table when the entries array is
> cleared, so that we don't have "pre-inserted" entries.
> 
> Thanks to Eric Dumazet for reminding me of the memory barrier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_stats.c b/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
> index 868f1bc..611b844 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
> @@ -117,21 +117,6 @@ static struct entry entries[MAX_ENTRIES];
>  
>  static atomic_t overflow_count;
>  
> -static void reset_entries(void)
> -{
> -	nr_entries = 0;
> -	memset(entries, 0, sizeof(entries));
> -	atomic_set(&overflow_count, 0);
> -}
> -
> -static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
> -{
> -	if (nr_entries >= MAX_ENTRIES)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	return entries + nr_entries++;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * The entries are in a hash-table, for fast lookup:
>   */
> @@ -149,6 +134,22 @@ static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
>  
>  static struct entry *tstat_hash_table[TSTAT_HASH_SIZE] __read_mostly;
>  
> +static void reset_entries(void)
> +{
> +	nr_entries = 0;
> +	memset(entries, 0, sizeof(entries));
> +	memset(tstat_hash_table, 0, sizeof(tstat_hash_table));
> +	atomic_set(&overflow_count, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
> +{
> +	if (nr_entries >= MAX_ENTRIES)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return entries + nr_entries++;
> +}
> +
>  static int match_entries(struct entry *entry1, struct entry *entry2)
>  {
>  	return entry1->timer       == entry2->timer	  &&
> @@ -202,12 +203,15 @@ static struct entry *tstat_lookup(struct entry *entry, char *comm)
>  	if (curr) {
>  		*curr = *entry;
>  		curr->count = 0;
> +		curr->next = NULL;
>  		memcpy(curr->comm, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> +
> +		smp_mb(); /* Ensure that curr is initialized before insert */
> +
>  		if (prev)
>  			prev->next = curr;
>  		else
>  			*head = curr;
> -		curr->next = NULL;
>  	}
>   out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(&table_lock);
> -

Well... :) , there is still a memory barrier missing it seems.

Another cpu might see a bad value if 'active=1' is set before tstat_hash_table is really cleared.


 diff -urp linux/kernel/time/timer_stats.c.orig linux/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
--- kernel/time/timer_stats.c.orig
+++ kernel/time/timer_stats.c
@@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ static ssize_t tstats_write(struct file 
                if (!active) {
                        reset_entries();
                        time_start = ktime_get();
+                       smp_mb();
                        active = 1;
                }
                break;


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/