[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070531152709.GA18775@atjola.homenet>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:27:09 +0200
From: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: iank@...dband.net, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Something goes wrong with timer statistics.
On 2007.05.31 17:10:07 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Well... :) , there is still a memory barrier missing it seems.
>
> Another cpu might see a bad value if 'active=1' is set before tstat_hash_table is really cleared.
Hm, that even makes the assumption in my first try valid ;-)
Just for the record, this time I thought that the barrier from the
spinlock in timer_stats_update_stats (right before the check for active)
would be enough, but that's obviously running on the wrong cpu if we
race... *sigh*
Thanks,
Björn
Fix two races in the timer stats lookup code. One by ensuring that the
initialization of a new entry is finished upon insertion of that entry.
The other by cleaning up the hash table when the entries array is
cleared, so that we don't have "pre-inserted" entries.
Thanks to Eric Dumazet for reminding me of the memory barriers.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
---
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_stats.c b/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
index 868f1bc..63d00f9 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
@@ -117,21 +117,6 @@ static struct entry entries[MAX_ENTRIES];
static atomic_t overflow_count;
-static void reset_entries(void)
-{
- nr_entries = 0;
- memset(entries, 0, sizeof(entries));
- atomic_set(&overflow_count, 0);
-}
-
-static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
-{
- if (nr_entries >= MAX_ENTRIES)
- return NULL;
-
- return entries + nr_entries++;
-}
-
/*
* The entries are in a hash-table, for fast lookup:
*/
@@ -149,6 +134,22 @@ static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
static struct entry *tstat_hash_table[TSTAT_HASH_SIZE] __read_mostly;
+static void reset_entries(void)
+{
+ nr_entries = 0;
+ memset(entries, 0, sizeof(entries));
+ memset(tstat_hash_table, 0, sizeof(tstat_hash_table));
+ atomic_set(&overflow_count, 0);
+}
+
+static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
+{
+ if (nr_entries >= MAX_ENTRIES)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return entries + nr_entries++;
+}
+
static int match_entries(struct entry *entry1, struct entry *entry2)
{
return entry1->timer == entry2->timer &&
@@ -202,12 +203,15 @@ static struct entry *tstat_lookup(struct entry *entry, char *comm)
if (curr) {
*curr = *entry;
curr->count = 0;
+ curr->next = NULL;
memcpy(curr->comm, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+
+ smp_mb(); /* Ensure that curr is initialized before insert */
+
if (prev)
prev->next = curr;
else
*head = curr;
- curr->next = NULL;
}
out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&table_lock);
@@ -360,6 +364,7 @@ static ssize_t tstats_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
if (!active) {
reset_entries();
time_start = ktime_get();
+ smb_mb();
active = 1;
}
break;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists