[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705311256230.26602@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> What I meant, was that the vast majority of MT+exec apps wants all their
> fds (but an handfull, maybe) to be O_CLOEXEC. So a global,
> non-inheritable, per-process flag seemed the most straightforward
> solution.
I'm with Uli on this one. "Stateful" stuff is bad. It's essentially
impossible to handle with libraries - either the library would have to
explciitly always turn the state the way _it_ needs it, or the library
will do the wrogn thing.
For example, what about libraries that are used to set up stdin/stdout for
the forker?
This is not unlike floating point rounding. Having stateful rounding (like
the i387) is *stupid*. You want per-operation rounding (where *one* of the
choices may be "use default"). Exactly because libraries etc will need to
control their _own_ internal choices.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists