[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705312145020.30386@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 21:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/fork.c:385
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:05:54PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2007, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> >
> > > I used the sn2_defconfig in the tree :)
> >
> > That is a static kernel build. Ideal for that kind of bug.
> Quite the opposite.
I thought that a static kernel build would throw out the __exit sections?
So it should trigger the bug?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists