[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070601064230.GA31661@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 08:42:30 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:45:31PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:05:54PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 31 May 2007, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > >
> > > > I used the sn2_defconfig in the tree :)
> > >
> > > That is a static kernel build. Ideal for that kind of bug.
> > Quite the opposite.
>
> I thought that a static kernel build would throw out the __exit sections?
> So it should trigger the bug?
Correct. But the other section mismatch warnings that Prarit
posted was not related to .exit.text (IIRC).
Anyway I will try to do a ia64 build tonight to take a short look at it.
If there is something general then I will fix it in modpost.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists