[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070602065923.GB8387@cvg>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:59:23 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
[Andrew Morton - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:54:22PM -0700]
| On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:34:03 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
|
| > | That patch is DOA, methinks.
| > |
| >
| > Andrew, what does it mean - "DOA"? Dead on arrival?
|
| yes - I dropped it.
|
But that could lead to rejection of my code-style-conversion patch...
Should I remake them?
Actually Jan was right, the current state of UDF (without his patches)
could lead to lost blocks and his patch must be just fixed I think.
Cyrill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists