linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070602000645.508ddf93.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:06:45 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:59:23 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:

> [Andrew Morton - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:54:22PM -0700]
> | On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:34:03 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> | 
> | > | That patch is DOA, methinks.
> | > | 
> | > 
> | > Andrew, what does it mean - "DOA"? Dead on arrival?
> | 
> | yes - I dropped it.
> | 
> 
> But that could lead to rejection of my code-style-conversion patch...
> Should I remake them?

Actually I've rebuilt those patches four times already.  People keep
changing stuff.

> Actually Jan was right, the current state of UDF (without his patches)
> could lead to lost blocks and his patch must be just fixed I think.

sure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/