linux-kernel - Re: libata & no PCI: dma_[un]map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070605165056.1d9d3815@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:56 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mroos@...ux.ee,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libata & no PCI: dma_[un]map_single undefined

> If you don't have DMA capabilities, does libata still need ->pad and
> ->pad_dma set?

It shouldn't - nor the prd. You don't need to use the default
ata_port_start in this case. I've just added ata_sff_port_start to my
tree which figures out which to allocate for SFF devices.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/