[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070606.023558.230059723.jet@gyve.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:35:58 +0900 (JST)
From: Masatake YAMATO <jet@...e.org>
To: cebbert@...hat.com
Cc: B.Zolnierkiewicz@...a.pw.edu.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] never called printk statement in
ide-taskfile.c::wait_drive_not_busy
> On 06/04/2007 10:21 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c b/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
> > index 30175c7..5e05311 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
> > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static u8 wait_drive_not_busy(ide_drive_t *drive)
> > while (((stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG)) & BUSY_STAT) && retries--)
> > udelay(10);
> >
> > - if (!retries)
> > + if (retries < 0)
>
> if (stat & BUSY_STAT)
>
> > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: drive still BUSY!\n", drive->name);
> >
Oh, yes.
Giving `retries' both roles: loop counter and condition flag for logging
may not good.
for (retries = 0; retries < 100; retries++)
{
if ((stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG)) & BUSY_STAT)
break;
udelay(10);
}
if (stat & BUSY_STAT)
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: drive still BUSY!\n", drive->name);
Masatake YAMATO
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists