linux-kernel - Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Fix NEC OHCI chip silicon bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:28:37 +0200
From:	Michael Hanselmann <linux-kernel@...smi.ch>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net,
	linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...lerfox.forkbomb.ch
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Fix NEC OHCI chip silicon bug

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:24:14AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> (Depending on which version of the kernel you are looking at -- [...]
> Earlier versions did behave the way you describe.)

I was looking at 2.6.22-rc3 which might explain the differences.

> So the system is behaving the way you want, but not for the reason you 
> think.  I bet you could remove the call to usb_root_hub_lost_power() 
> entirely and it wouldn't make any difference at all.

Actually, that's true. René Nussbaumer tried without that call and it
still works as intended. Should I leave that call out and drop the
changes on usb_root_hub_lost_power for CONFIG_PM?

Greets,
Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/