linux-kernel - Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:29:58 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is
	used

On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 16:03 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Yep - and there are some other changes needed as well once everyone
> gets their ports properly lined up (notably handing back the actual
> speed). 

Yeah, probably. This was was required just to get the speed thing to
pass basic testing though.

You earlier made a cryptic comment about asm-generic and said the
PowerPC patch wouldn't work -- I didn't understand, and it doesn't seem
to be empirically confirmed. Can you eludicate?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/