linux-kernel - Re: [REPOST PATCH] sata_promise: use TF interface for polling NODATA commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46683E4D.9060801@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:20:13 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...eaves.com,
	jean.luc.coulon@...il.com, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH] sata_promise: use TF interface for polling NODATA
 commands

On 06/06/2007 12:05 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> FYI to all -- 
> 
> As a reminder. the Promise hardware programs registers when it receives
> a SET FEATURES - XFER MODE.
> 
> If data transfer is occurring on OTHER ports at the time this is issued,
> then data corruption is guaranteed to occur.  Polling will not fix this
> problem -- all ports need to be inactive, when a SET FEATURES - XFER
> MODE command is issued for any port.
> 

So is this patch OK but yet more work needs to be done, or does
this patch cause new problems?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/