linux-kernel - Re: [REPOST PATCH] sata_promise: use TF interface for polling NODATA commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:25:07 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...eaves.com,
	jean.luc.coulon@...il.com, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH] sata_promise: use TF interface for polling NODATA commands

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:20:13PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 06/06/2007 12:05 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > FYI to all -- 
> > 
> > As a reminder. the Promise hardware programs registers when it receives
> > a SET FEATURES - XFER MODE.
> > 
> > If data transfer is occurring on OTHER ports at the time this is issued,
> > then data corruption is guaranteed to occur.  Polling will not fix this
> > problem -- all ports need to be inactive, when a SET FEATURES - XFER
> > MODE command is issued for any port.

> So is this patch OK but yet more work needs to be done, or does
> this patch cause new problems?

Causes no /new/ problems...  :)  The existing problem described above
remains.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/