lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706071059140.6445@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
cc:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> accept2(int fd, ...)

I don't see any reason to not have it inherit the non-sequential 
characteristics of "fd".



> pipe2(int *fds, int oflags);

I think pipe+sys_nonseqfd should be OK for those.



> eventfd2(int count, int oflags);
> signalfd2(int ufd, sigset_t __user *user_mask, size_t sizemask, int oflags);
> timerfd2(int ufd, int clockid, int flags,const struct itimerspec __user *utmr, int oflags) ...

Those I think we're still in time to change the interface. No?
Even if not, those are not perf-critical, so I think that 
syscall+sys_nonseqfd is still fine.



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ