[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46684894.5010506@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:04:04 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
CC: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Cache aliases. When the same page of physical memory is mapped twice to
> user space, let's say at address addr and addr + PAGE_SIZE this is normally
> harmless although wasteful on processors with virtually indexed caches as
> long as the page is mapped read-only such as in case of ZERO_PAGE.
>
> If the same thing happens with a writable page there is the chance of
> severe data corruption. Some members of the R4000 family are now trying
> to be helpful by throwing the kernel a "virtual coherency" exception. The
> bad news about this exception is there might be thousands (the theoretical
> worst case would be millions) of it in a single second, so servicing can be
> very expensive. For the ZERO page this can be avoided by using several
> pages mapped in a way such that their addresses don't conflict.
Note that it can be a *very expensive* waste even on machines that do
this in hardware. Colouring the zeropage can have sizable performance
advantages for virtually no cost.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists