linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] intel-rng: Undo mess made by an 80 column extremist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4668AC10.9060305@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:08:32 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
CC:	Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@....ed.ac.uk>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-rng: Undo mess made by an 80 column extremist

Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@....ed.ac.uk> writes:
> 
>> I personally buy the argument that 80 cols helps remind people that they've 
>> used too many indentation depths and should redesign their code.
>> I think it's 
>> a good thing to stick to where possible, even if just from a design 
>> perspective.
> 
> How many is too many? A function with 2 "if" means 3 tabs = 24 characters
> for just indentation. Add a printk(KERN_DEBUG "\n"); and you can print
> ca. 30 characters without having to break the string. This is crazy.
> 

My big concern with the 80-column rule is that it discourages commenting.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/