linux-kernel - Re: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200706080807.l5887qJH017346@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:07:52 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wli@...omorphy.com
Cc:	ak@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lkml@....ca
Subject: Re: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:35:51 -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> @@ -573,12 +574,12 @@
>  	config VMSPLIT_3G
>  		bool "3G/1G user/kernel split"
>  	config VMSPLIT_3G_OPT
> -		depends on !HIGHMEM
> +		depends on !X86_PAE
>  		bool "3G/1G user/kernel split (for full 1G low memory)"
>  	config VMSPLIT_2G
>  		bool "2G/2G user/kernel split"
>  	config VMSPLIT_2G_OPT
> -		depends on !HIGHMEM
> +		depends on !X86_PAE
>  		bool "2G/2G user/kernel split (for full 2G low memory)"
>  	config VMSPLIT_1G
>  		bool "1G/3G user/kernel split"

Is this really needed? I can see why VMSPLIT_{2,3}G_OPT would
depend on !HIGHMEM, but why would they depend on !X86_PAE?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/