linux-kernel - Re: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Jun 2007 07:47:37 -0700
From:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lkml@....ca
Subject: Re: divorce CONFIG_X86_PAE from CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:07:52AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Is this really needed? I can see why VMSPLIT_{2,3}G_OPT would
> depend on !HIGHMEM, but why would they depend on !X86_PAE?

The only reason they depend on !HIGHMEM is because handling for
1GB-unaligned splits is unimplemented for PAE, which formerly only
occurred in conjunction with HIGHMEM64G. That said, they were oriented
toward avoiding highmem on laptops, hence the broader !HIGHMEM
constraint. The entire point of the patch is to add an option to use
PAE without highmem for the purposes of NX and secondarily expanded
swapspace, at which point CONFIG_VMSPLIT_[23]G_OPT need some other way
besides !HIGHMEM to exclude PAE, such as specifying !X86_PAE directly.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/