[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706081701250.4205@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > You need things to be *repeatable* for debugging. No ifs, buts, or maybes
> > about it.
>
> It all depends on how you use the file descriptor.
Read what I wrote. "for debugging".
If your code is bug-free, and does what you intend it to do, everything is
fine. But you wouldn't be doing debugging then, would you?
For debugging, it does _not_ depend on "how you use the file descriptor".
The whole _point_ is that something does something wrong. Maybe you
_intended_ to use the file descriptor some way, and the bug was that you
didn't.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists