[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <466C256C.9040509@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:23:08 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gregor Jasny <gjasny@...glemail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: limit post SRST nsect/lbal wait to ~100ms
Tejun Heo wrote:
> After SRST, libata used to wait for nsect/lbal to be set to 1/1 for
> the slave device. However, some ATAPI devices don't set nsect/lbal
> after SRST and the wait itself isn't too useful as we're gonna wait
> for !BSY right after that anyway.
>
> Before reset-seq update, nsect/lbal wait failure used to be ignored
> and caused 30sec delay during detection. After reset-seq, all
> timeouts are considered error conditions making libata fail to detect
> such ATAPI devices.
>
> This patch limits nsect/lbal wait to around 100ms. This should give
> acceptable behavior to such ATAPI devices while not disturbing the
> heavily used code path too much.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
> ---
> Okay, here it is. Sorry for the delay.
>
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Thanks. Maybe Gregor can confirm this fixes his problem?
I'll ACK and push upstream then...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists