[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706101834.19977.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:34:19 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [patch-mm 06/23] clockevents: Fix resume logic
On Sunday, 10 June 2007 15:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 12:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > This is the resume part, or at least it seems so, but the above one is a
> > suspend callback. If I understand it correctly, this one replaces
> > hpet_resume(), but is it sufficient for the suspend part too?
>
> Oops. Sorry, misunderstood you. Yeah, it's intentional. It gets reset on
> power off and we have not seen any problems with this yet.
OK, I wouldn't do it in this patch, though.
IMO it's a bit more than the changelog says and we'll lose the track record of
this change if it goes like this. Would that be possible to separate it?
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists