[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070610175228.GA28947@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:52:28 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Tsugikazu Shibata <tshibata@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com
Subject: kconfig .po files in kernel tree? [Was: Documentation/HOWTO translated into Japanese]
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
> > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
> > tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
> > authoritative docs stay in the tree, in english, so that as many
> > contributors as possible can read and update them. It would then be a
> > seperate project to generate translations and keep them updated
> > according to what's in the tree. Perhaps we could get the kernel.org
> > people to create an official space for that and then place a pointer
> > to that site in Documentation/ somewhere.
>
> No, I think the translated files should be in the tree proper, we have
> the space :)
We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then
the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree.
I advocated that they should stay out back then.
But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound.
Any opinion about the .po files?
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists