[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070611184621.GA25371@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:46:21 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
Steve Fox <drfickle@...ibm.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move the kernel to 16MB for NUMA-Q
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:19:57PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Jun 11 2007 10:36, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> >Picking the 16 MB base is a bit obnoxious on small-memory machines, 4 MB
> >would probably be a more reasonable base. Of course, 16 MB would avoid
> > the issue of the handful of machines with memory holes at 15-16 MB.
>
> How will this work at all with a 5 MB machine?
Unless you're running with a bunch of CONFIG_EMBEDDED options enabled,
and a seriously pared down (almost to the point of uselessness)
userspace, you may have already lost.
Do such beasts even exist ? My memories of low-memory x86en I had
only allowed power of 2 memory sizes.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists