linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] move the kernel to 16MB for NUMA-Q

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <466D9C00.6030608@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:01:20 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Steve Fox <drfickle@...ibm.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move the kernel to 16MB for NUMA-Q

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jun 11 2007 10:36, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Picking the 16 MB base is a bit obnoxious on small-memory machines, 4 MB
>> would probably be a more reasonable base.  Of course, 16 MB would avoid
>>  the issue of the handful of machines with memory holes at 15-16 MB.
> 
> How will this work at all with a 5 MB machine?

Does current kernels work at all on a 5 MB machine?

(I used Linux on a 5 MB machine many years ago, but modern kernels are a
different issue...)

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/