[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070612114345.07ab60f6@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:43:45 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Cc: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VIA C7 / VIA PC-1 (PC2500) anyone?
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:21:43 +0400
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> wrote:
> I bought a VIA PC2500 board a few days ago - this
> new series of their mobos,
>
> This beast looks nice - after replacing their cooling
> system (that had a small fan on it) with larger but
> fanless, -- it becomes a almost real PC (1500MHz CPU),
> equipped with quite nice crypto and multimedia abilities,
> but with very low power consumption and very quiet.
>
> But the thing is - it doesn't quite work.
That is usually memory or motherboard timings. memtest86+ will miss a lot
of problems on these boards for some reason I don't really fathom
although its still a worthwhile test you did
I'd be interested to knowwhat the following do
Bad RAM check:
Boot with mem= to limit to the bottom 256MB of RAM
(Windows tends to use different areas of RAM to Linux the most so
your report fits that)
Stress testing:
Go into X in a high resoution, starting running a continuous
copy to or from disk and see if its suddenely much less stable
Disabling power management
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists