linux-kernel - Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070612104032.GA8000@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:40:32 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc:	ck@....kolivas.org, Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner@...il.com>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck]
	Mainline plans)


* Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org> wrote:

> So unless there's a vm issue (which does not appear to be the case) I 
> can't see how any of these will change Tobias' extensive testing 
> results.

yep - i've retested with -ck2 and cannot reproduce his results. So i'm 
waiting for his feedback to see why this workload is behaving like that 
on his box and why not more like what other testers have found:

   http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-June/007817.html

in any case, we'll figure this out :-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/