linux-kernel - Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200706121411.56016.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:11:55 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	nigel@...el.suspend2.net
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Christian Leber <christian@...er.de>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep

Hi,

On Tuesday, 12 June 2007 00:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
> and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
> useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile and
> install a kernel, but wants to do what they can to get provide helpful
> debugging info and perhaps even get it going.

I like this idea.

> Yes, Pavel, I'll supply a patch if you (plural) agree.

I agree.  :-)

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/