linux-kernel - Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1181697460.4910.7.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:17:39 +1000
From:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Christian Leber <christian@...er.de>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep

Hi.

On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tuesday, 12 June 2007 00:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
> > and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
> > useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile and
> > install a kernel, but wants to do what they can to get provide helpful
> > debugging info and perhaps even get it going.
> 
> I like this idea.
> 
> > Yes, Pavel, I'll supply a patch if you (plural) agree.
> 
> I agree.  :-)

Ok. I'll take Pavel's silence as agreement too. I'll be a little slow
(as usual, nowadays!), but will try to get it done next week. I think I
can in clear conscience do it on Redhat time if I don't manage it
beforehand.

Regards,

Nigel

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)