[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m14plcpsjq.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:11:21 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com> writes:
> On some machines, buggy BIOSes don't properly setup WB MTRRs to
> cover all available RAM, meaning the last few megs (or even gigs)
> of memory will be marked uncached. Since Linux tends to allocate
> from high memory addresses first, this causes the machine to be
> unusably slow as soon as the kernel starts really using memory
> (i.e. right around init time).
>
> This patch works around the problem by scanning the MTRRs at
> boot and figuring out whether the current end_pfn value (setup
> by early e820 code) goes beyond the highest WB MTRR range, and
> if so, trimming it to match. A fairly obnoxious KERN_WARNING
> is printed too, letting the user know that not all of their
> memory is available due to a likely BIOS bug.
A quick update. This patch is horribly incorrect on a socket F
opteron/Athlon 64 with memory above 4GB.
In particular those cpus are capable of mapping all of memory
above 4GB as write back without using a single MTRR.
So examining MTRRs is insufficient.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists