linux-kernel - RE: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0C7297FA1D2D244A9C7F6959C0BF1E5201FDE2CB@azsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:32:42 -0700
From:	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor

> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
> Unfortunately these cleanups get into a huge fight with your very own
> git-md-accel.patch:
> 
Yes, you missed the note that said:

	Note, I have not rebased git-md-accel yet.  While that is
happening I
	wanted to have this patch out for review.

> I assume that you're prepared to repair all that damage to your tree,
but
> it seems a bit masochistic?

It's either this or have an inconsistent coding style throughout
raid5.c.  I figure it is worth it to have reduced code duplication
between raid5 and raid6, and it makes it easier to add new cache
features going forward.  I have a few more cleanups to add for a rev2 of
this patch, but I will hold that off until the rebase is done.

Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/