linux-kernel - Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20706121509x43dda6f6uc3b4d70a01c0c891@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:09:03 -0700
From:	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor

> > I assume that you're prepared to repair all that damage to your tree, but
> > it seems a bit masochistic?
>
> It's either this or have an inconsistent coding style throughout
> raid5.c.  I figure it is worth it to have reduced code duplication
> between raid5 and raid6, and it makes it easier to add new cache
> features going forward.  I have a few more cleanups to add for a rev2 of
> this patch, but I will hold that off until the rebase is done.
>

In other words, it seemed like a good idea at the time, but I am open
to suggestions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/