[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <orabv2fncv.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:38:08 -0300
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
To: "Alan Milnes" <alan@...oundation.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Jun 14, 2007, "Alan Milnes" <alan@...oundation.org.uk> wrote:
> Agreed - if you want to take my work you are welcome as long as you
> contribute back your changes. That's the deal that GPL2 enforces and
> why it has been so successful.
Where did you get this impression that GPLv2 enforces this deal?
It doesn't, and this is *exactly* why I dispute the claim that GPLv2
is tit-for-tat.
> GPL3 is a very different beast with a much wider agenda,
The agenda is *precisely* the same: ensure that all users are free to
modify and share the licensed software.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists