[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46717C58.8050501@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:35:20 -0400
From: Florin Malita <fmalita@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
CC: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net> wrote:
>
>>> When they download the software, they get another copy, and they have
>>> a right to modify that copy.
>>>
>> But you get the TiVO corporations copy of the software?
>>
>
> Yes. The customer gets the copy that TiVO stored in the hard disk in
> the device it sells. And it's that copy that the customer is entitled
> to modify because TiVO is still able to modify it.
>
No, by this twisted logic Tivo *cannot* modify that particular copy any
more than you can. They can modify *another* copy (just like you) and
they can *replace* the copy in your device with the new version (unlike
you).
So your entire logical construct does not stand because this is not
(cannot be) about modifying a particular copy (how would you do that
anyway? hexedit the binary blob in place?) but about the ability to
deploy the software on a particular platform.
---
fm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists