[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6934efce0706151030v3357afe6q8073c59610f3b924@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:30:19 -0700
From: "Jared Hulbert" <jaredeh@...il.com>
To: "Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: carsteno@...ibm.com, "Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
richard.griffiths@...driver.com,
"Richard Griffiths" <res07ml0@...izon.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@...ybastard.org>,
"Heiko Carstens" <h.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
> If you can write code that doesn't need any struct pages that would make
> life a bit easier, since we wouldn't need any pseudo memory hotplug code
> that just adds struct pages.
That was my gut feel too. However, it seems from Carsten and Jörn
discussion of read/write XIP on Flash (and some new Phase Change)
memories that having the struct pages has a lot of potential benefits.
Wouldn't it also allow most of the mm routines to remain unchanged.
I just worry that it would be difficult to set apart these non
volitatile pages that can't be written too directly.
> We would still need to add the kernel mapping though.
But that's handled by ioremap()ing it right?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists